<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title>unalog - latest for url</title><link href="/url/94b039dd2c0c1b86c0edf3913c7f6a27/" rel="alternate"></link><id>/url/94b039dd2c0c1b86c0edf3913c7f6a27/</id><updated>2006-03-28T00:37:35Z</updated><entry><title>PennTags /</title><link href="http://tags.library.upenn.edu/" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-03-28T00:37:35Z</updated><id>tag:tags.library.upenn.edu,2006-03-28://</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="tagging"></category><category term="folksonomies"></category><category term="OPAC"></category></entry><entry><title>PennTags /</title><link href="http://tags.library.upenn.edu/" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-03-27T21:48:55Z</updated><id>tag:tags.library.upenn.edu,2006-03-27://</id><summary type="html">I'm curious why the UPenn Library decided to do its own social bookmarking sytem, and what it's gained from doing so.</summary><category term="academic"></category><category term="tagging"></category><category term="folksonomy"></category><category term="library"></category></entry></feed>
