<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title>unalog - latest from LionKimbro - tag "reason"</title><link href="/user/LionKimbro/tag/reason/" rel="alternate"></link><id>/user/LionKimbro/tag/reason/</id><updated>2008-08-05T02:06:33Z</updated><entry><title>On Wisdom: Imagination</title><link href="http://www.poemsforfree.com/wimagi.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2008-08-05T02:06:33Z</updated><id>tag:www.poemsforfree.com,2008-08-05:/wimagi.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="imagination"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="principles"></category></entry><entry><title>George E. P. Box - Wikiquote</title><link href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_E._P._Box" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2008-06-25T19:39:53Z</updated><id>tag:en.wikiquote.org,2008-06-25:/wiki/George_E._P._Box/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="model"></category><category term="models"></category><category term="thinkinggoo"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="statistics"></category><category term="person"></category></entry><entry><title>Wm. Van Dusen Wishard Speech</title><link href="http://www.commonwealthnorth.org/transcripts/wishard.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2008-06-04T22:35:27Z</updated><id>tag:www.commonwealthnorth.org,2008-06-04:/transcripts/wishard.html/</id><summary type="html">"Impulse and pleasure, Bell says, are alone real and lifeaffirming in postmodernism. Reason is the enemy, and the desires of the body constitute truth. Postmodernism eliminates the boundaries of art and insists that acting out, rather than making distinctions, is the path to knowledge."</summary><category term="postmodernism"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="impulse"></category><category term="pleasure"></category><category term="hedonism"></category><category term="singularity"></category><category term="toread"></category></entry><entry><title>The Suicide of Thought</title><link href="http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/orthodoxy/ch3.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2008-03-08T01:27:20Z</updated><id>tag:www.cse.dmu.ac.uk,2008-03-08:/~mward/gkc/books/orthodoxy/ch3.html/</id><summary type="html">"Yet she was a perfectly practical person who did something, while they are wild speculators who do nothing." "...defend the pragmatist method as a preliminary guide to truth..."</summary><category term="chesterton"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="will"></category><category term="thought"></category><category term="joanofarc"></category><category term="action"></category></entry><entry><title>The End of Rationalism - An Interview with John Ralston Saul</title><link href="http://www.scottlondon.com/interviews/saul.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2008-03-07T03:56:32Z</updated><id>tag:www.scottlondon.com,2008-03-07:/interviews/saul.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="reason"></category><category term="rationalism"></category><category term="postmodernism"></category><category term="author"></category><category term="interview"></category></entry><entry><title>Notes on What's What</title><link href="http://www.island.org/huxley/whatswhat.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2008-02-05T20:56:35Z</updated><id>tag:www.island.org,2008-02-05:/huxley/whatswhat.html/</id><summary type="html">"We cannot reason ourselves out of our basic irrationality. All we can do is learn the art of being irrational in a reasonable way."</summary><category term="aldushuxley"></category><category term="island"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="irrationality"></category><category term="rational"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="irrational"></category><category term="quote"></category><category term="quotes"></category><category term="quotations"></category><category term="quotation"></category></entry><entry><title>THE WORLD QUESTION CENTER 2007  Page 12</title><link href="http://edge.org/q2007/q07_12.html#lanier" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2008-01-30T17:15:41Z</updated><id>tag:edge.org,2008-01-30:/q2007/q07_12.html/lanier</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="edge"></category><category term="question"></category><category term="questions"></category><category term="jaronlanier"></category><category term="homuncularflexibility"></category><category term="virtualreality"></category><category term="reason"></category></entry><entry><title>Slashdot | Is Good Scientific Journalism Possible?</title><link href="http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/25/211256" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-09-25T22:26:22Z</updated><id>tag:ask.slashdot.org,2007-09-25:/article.pl/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="reason"></category><category term="society"></category><category term="hivemind"></category><category term="science"></category><category term="journalism"></category><category term="slashdot"></category><category term="assumption"></category><category term="thinkinggoo"></category></entry><entry><title>[FoRK] Reason is a Jungle</title><link href="http://www.xent.com/pipermail/fork/Week-of-Mon-20070917/046504.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-09-18T17:00:46Z</updated><id>tag:www.xent.com,2007-09-18:/pipermail/fork/Week-of-Mon-20070917/046504.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="fork"></category><category term="book"></category><category term="idea"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="jungle"></category><category term="natureofreason"></category></entry><entry><title>The Getting Of Hope: Personal Empowerment Through Permaculture</title><link href="http://www.rosneath.com.au/ipc6/ch04/smith/index.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-06-28T23:55:21Z</updated><id>tag:www.rosneath.com.au,2007-06-28:/ipc6/ch04/smith/index.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="reason"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="reasoning"></category><category term="despair"></category><category term="permaculture"></category></entry><entry><title>www.smh.com.au - It's not rational to be rational</title><link href="http://www.smh.com.au/text/articles/2007/06/10/1181414135313.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-06-26T19:21:21Z</updated><id>tag:www.smh.com.au,2007-06-26:/text/articles/2007/06/10/1181414135313.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="rationality"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="irrationality"></category><category term="rational"></category><category term="economics"></category></entry><entry><title>The Nature of Reason</title><link href="http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/80-150/" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-06-11T18:30:50Z</updated><id>tag:www.andrew.cmu.edu,2007-06-11:/course/80-150//</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="reason"></category><category term="natureofreason"></category><category term="nature"></category><category term="philosophy"></category><category term="class"></category><category term="toread"></category></entry><entry><title>The Age of Virtuous Machines</title><link href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0708.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-06-08T07:16:39Z</updated><id>tag:www.kurzweilai.net,2007-06-08:/meme/frame.html/</id><summary type="html">I disagree strongly with the author.  Reason is the *problem,* not the solution.  Reason is intrinsically both convergent and divergent.  The notion that reasoning can converge to an ideal good neglects this.</summary><category term="friendlyai"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="evolutionarypsychology"></category><category term="evolutionarymorality"></category></entry><entry><title>Debunking Pseudo-Skeptical Arguments</title><link href="http://www.geocities.com/wwu777us/Debunking_Skeptical_Arguments.htm?20077" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-06-07T21:12:20Z</updated><id>tag:www.geocities.com,2007-06-07:/wwu777us/Debunking_Skeptical_Arguments.htm/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="reason"></category><category term="process"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="pseudoscience"></category><category term="science"></category><category term="paranormal"></category></entry><entry><title>spiked | Debunking the debunkers</title><link href="http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/1884/" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-06-07T21:08:36Z</updated><id>tag:www.spiked-online.com,2007-06-07:/index.php/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="skepticism"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="rational"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="scientism"></category><category term="pseudoscience"></category></entry><entry><title>making sense of the absurd || kuro5hin.org</title><link href="http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2007/5/16/223019/102" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-05-20T19:22:24Z</updated><id>tag:www.kuro5hin.org,2007-05-20:/story/2007/5/16/223019/102/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="religion"></category><category term="science"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="rational"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="kuro5hin"></category><category term="article"></category><category term="essay"></category><category term="catholicism"></category></entry><entry><title>Book Excerpt: The Assault on Reason | TIME</title><link href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1622015,00.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-05-20T17:40:05Z</updated><id>tag:www.time.com,2007-05-20:/time/nation/article/0,8599,1622015,00.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="reason"></category><category term="gore"></category><category term="algore"></category><category term="book"></category><category term="excerpt"></category></entry><entry><title>Comment on 26 Common Climate Myths Debunked</title><link href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=234957&amp;cid=19150083" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-05-16T21:54:08Z</updated><id>tag:science.slashdot.org,2007-05-16:/comments.pl/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="socialreasoning"></category><category term="categoryreasoning"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="reasoning"></category><category term="pseudoscience"></category><category term="religion"></category><category term="xavier"></category><category term="slashdot"></category><category term="comment"></category></entry><entry><title>Spirituality without Faith</title><link href="http://www.naturalism.org/spiritua1.htm" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-05-16T18:45:57Z</updated><id>tag:www.naturalism.org,2007-05-16:/spiritua1.htm/</id><summary type="html">"Many humanists, of course, will not necessarily want to access what I will call the "spiritual response." Even if I persuade them that theres nothing conceptually incoherent about a naturalistic spirituality, they might be constitutionally disinclined to indulge in emotions or practices that even temporarily disengage the rational mind set. I wont argue against such reluctance, since each of us has his or her own tastes in aesthetic experience, and varying "comfort levels" in letting go. But the spiritual response is there for those who wish to experience it. Its intrinsically rewarding in its own right, and a valuable resource in getting us through tough times."</summary><category term="atheistreluctancetoevospir"></category><category term="evolutionaryspirituality"></category><category term="atheist"></category><category term="atheists"></category><category term="reluctance"></category><category term="reluctant"></category><category term="toread"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="purpose"></category><category term="maxtegmark"></category></entry><entry><title>JSTOR: NoÃ»s: Vol. 6, No. 2 (May, 1972), pp. 97-117</title><link href="http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0029-4624(197205)6%3A2%3C97%3ARATMOT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-05-05T10:53:41Z</updated><id>tag:links.jstor.org,2007-05-05:/sici/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="reason"></category><category term="arrow"></category><category term="rationality"></category></entry><entry><title>Foreword</title><link href="http://www.psitek.net/pages/PsiTekTMKS2.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-04-11T13:54:23Z</updated><id>tag:www.psitek.net,2007-04-11:/pages/PsiTekTMKS2.html/</id><summary type="html">"Addition and subtraction are therefore spiritual transactions; reasoning is a spiritual process; ideas are spiritual conceptions; questions are spiritual searchlights and logic, argument and philosophy is spiritual machinery."</summary><category term="evolutionaryspirituality"></category><category term="free"></category><category term="book"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="argument"></category><category term="spirit"></category><category term="thought"></category><category term="natural"></category><category term="nature"></category></entry><entry><title>xkcd - A webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language - By Randall Munroe</title><link href="http://xkcd.com/c54.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-04-01T06:21:53Z</updated><id>tag:xkcd.com,2007-04-01:/c54.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="bigbang"></category><category term="cmbr"></category><category term="science"></category><category term="work"></category><category term="works"></category><category term="real"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="comic"></category><category term="xkcd"></category></entry><entry><title>48% of Americans Reject Evolution</title><link href="http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=228913&amp;cid=18558977" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2007-04-01T06:20:19Z</updated><id>tag:science.slashdot.org,2007-04-01:/comments.pl/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="whydopeoplebelieve"></category><category term="why"></category><category term="believe"></category><category term="population"></category><category term="populous"></category><category term="antievolution"></category><category term="evolution"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="reasoning"></category><category term="intuitive"></category><category term="intuitiveness"></category></entry><entry><title>Science and Human Values - Contents</title><link href="http://www.rit.edu/~flwstv/contents.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-10-21T01:43:36Z</updated><id>tag:www.rit.edu,2006-10-21:/~flwstv/contents.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="evolutionaryspirituality"></category><category term="ethics"></category><category term="science"></category><category term="human"></category><category term="values"></category><category term="book"></category><category term="web"></category><category term="free"></category><category term="myth"></category><category term="reason"></category></entry><entry><title>FBI Planning New Net-Tapping Push (comment)</title><link href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=190634&amp;cid=15685270" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-07-09T19:33:00Z</updated><id>tag:yro.slashdot.org,2006-07-09:/comments.pl/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="terrorism"></category><category term="statistics"></category><category term="symbol"></category><category term="symbols"></category><category term="symbolic"></category><category term="mobrule"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="emotion"></category></entry><entry><title>Judgemental Heuristics and Biases:</title><link href="http://www.nku.edu/~garns/165/pptj_h.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-06-30T17:30:32Z</updated><id>tag:www.nku.edu,2006-06-30:/~garns/165/pptj_h.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="heuristics"></category><category term="heuristic"></category><category term="bias"></category><category term="systematic"></category><category term="error"></category><category term="probability"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="reasoning"></category></entry><entry><title>Critical Thinking (Skeptical Inquirer March/April 2006)</title><link href="http://www.csicop.org/si/2006-02/thinking.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-06-03T06:19:16Z</updated><id>tag:www.csicop.org,2006-06-03:/si/2006-02/thinking.html/</id><summary type="html">Here's the thing: This article is itself guilty of EXACTLY what it's talking about. I personally agree with: "I know that I know nothing." Then you're free to try and live as rationally as you like, recognizing that it's impossible (too costly) to truly live rationally.</summary><category term="shibboleth"></category><category term="criticalthinking"></category><category term="skeptics"></category><category term="skeptic"></category><category term="rationality"></category><category term="rationalism"></category><category term="reason"></category></entry><entry><title>Secular Web Kiosk and Bookstore</title><link href="http://www.secweb.org/index.aspx?action=viewAsset&amp;id=138" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-04-04T22:27:47Z</updated><id>tag:www.secweb.org,2006-04-04:/index.aspx/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="rationality"></category><category term="belief"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="toread"></category><category term="trust"></category></entry><entry><title>Explananda: Evolutionary just-so stories</title><link href="http://www.explananda.com/archives/000907.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-02-17T17:09:43Z</updated><id>tag:www.explananda.com,2006-02-17:/archives/000907.html/</id><summary type="html"></summary><category term="psychology"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="irrational"></category><category term="justso"></category><category term="evolutionarypsychology"></category><category term="evopsych"></category></entry><entry><title>Explananda: Evolutionary reasons</title><link href="http://www.explananda.com/archives/000906.html" rel="alternate"></link><updated>2006-02-15T08:41:22Z</updated><id>tag:www.explananda.com,2006-02-15:/archives/000906.html/</id><summary type="html">Evopsych.</summary><category term="psychology"></category><category term="reason"></category><category term="irrational"></category><category term="justso"></category><category term="evolutionarypsychology"></category></entry></feed>